Initially, the results showed that the odds of violence for the African American patients were 2.7 times greater than the odds for Whites. Most of all, neighborhood context of the patients were also measured and these include neighborhood poverty, neighborhood wealth, neighborhood family structure, neighborhood employment, neighborhood residential stability, neighborhood ethnic composition, neighborhood housing stock. During the 20 weeks following their discharge, they were also asked regarding their race (African-American or White) and were also observed for acts of violence such as acts of battery resulting in physical injury sexual assaults assaultive acts that involved use of a weapon or threats with the use of a weapon. ![]() This was performed on the patients who were discharged to 145 neighborhoods in the Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Or Ph.D.) to establish clinical scales and validate the chart diagnosis using DSM-IIIR checklist. The data collection from the patients were accomplished in a span of 20 weeks and were obtained in two-parts: first, the patients were interviewed by a trained lay-person in order to gather various background information and were subsequently interviewed by a professionally-trained research clinician (either M.A./M.SW. The criteria used in selecting the patients include civil admissions, White or African-American, English-speaking, those who are between 18 and 40 years old, and has a history of mental disorders and diseases such as schizophreniform, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, dysthymia, depression, brief reactive psychosis, mania, delusional disorder, personality disorder, or alcohol or drug abuse or independence. In order to substantiate his claims, the author, along with his colleagues, conducted a study on 270 patients who were discharged from an acute in-patient facility, the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic. In short, the article proves the importance of contextual measurement or the measurement of living and social conditions as an important component in the study of violence among mentally-disturbed people. Moreover, according to the article, the results that show how race is a major factor in violence among individuals with mental disorders is a prime example of individualistic fallacy, which states that outcomes in the individual level can be thoroughly explained using individual-level characteristics. In fact, as the article illustrated, it is the neighborhood context or the social conditions of a patient with a mental disorder which is a more significant factor. ![]() The article, “Race, Neighborhood Disadvantage, and Violence Among Persons with Mental Disorders: The Importance of Contextual Measurement,” written by Eric Silver, basically shows that race, contrary to popular perception and to results of various researches, is not a major factor in the measuring and analyzing violence among patients with mental disorders. ![]() Summary of the article “Race, Neighborhood Disadvantage, and Violence Among Persons with Mental Disorders: The Importance of Contextual Measurement”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |